Big govt, Courts, Politics

Mitchell Memo Destroys Ford’s Allegations

Prosecutor Rachel Mitchell released a powerful five-page memo on Sunday reflecting on Kavanaugh accuser Christine Ford’s testimony last week before the Senate Judiciary Committee. In it, Mitchell – who questioned Ford – detailed nine significant problems with Ford’s testimony, arguing that her case is “even weaker” than a “he said, she said.” “A ‘he said, she said’ case is incredibly difficult to prove,” Mitchell wrote, “but this case is even weaker than that. Dr. Ford identified other witnesses to the event, and those witnesses either refuted her allegations or failed to corroborate them . . . Nor do I believe that this evidence is sufficient to satisfy the preponderance-of-the-evidence standard.” Democrats, hell-bent on destroying Kavanaugh, will get the FBI investigation they want . . . and it’s only going to further solidify his confirmation for the SCOTUS.

Here’s more from The Daily Wire…

Rachel Mitchell, the prosecutor who questioned Christine Blasey Ford last week during a hearing in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee, wrote a five-page memo that was released on Sunday that outlines why she would not bring criminal charges against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

Mitchell’s memo notes nine significant problems with Ford’s testimony and underscores that her case is “even weaker” than a “he said, she said” case.

“A ‘he said, she said’ case is incredibly difficult to prove,” Mitchell states. “But this case is even weaker than that. Dr. Ford identified other witnesses to the event, and those witnesses either refuted her allegations or failed to corroborate them. For the reasons discussed below, I do not think that a reasonable prosecutor would bring this case based on the evidence before the Committee. Nor do I believe that this evidence is sufficient to satisfy the preponderance-of-the-evidence standard.”

You Might Also Like